Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Post by **Big Kev** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:23 am

Debbie Gibson (remember her? 80's pop pipestrelle) has ventured in to films and made possibly one of the 'best' straight to video films ever!

[youtube] [/youtube]

Vilante · Post by **Vilante** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:44 am

Worst CGI/editing ever, never mind the acting and everything else lol

Why is the shark biting bridges? Is the Golden Gate bridge filled with meat?

Rots · Post by **Rots** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:12 pm

That is Z grade at best. lol.

NeilPearson · Post by **NeilPearson** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:08 pm

"HOLY SHIT"

omg i havent laughed so hard in ages

w00dsy · Post by **w00dsy** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:44 pm

it's like porn without the porn.

Righteous · Post by **Righteous** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:53 pm

I'm sure this had a cinema release? I know that a lot of the CGI was done with Lightwave, which was a big talking point (read shame) on the LW forums.

durbster · Post by **durbster** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:12 pm

This is on my DVD rental list

pogo · Post by **pogo** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:48 pm

durbster wrote:This is on my DVD rental list

Hell yeah, looks great

I wonder, are they just bad actors, or are they directed to act badly for comedic effect? I mean, this obviously has a sense of humour and is surely taking the piss out of itself

Coopz · Post by **Coopz** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:04 pm

Holy Jezus Juice what was that...o_0

Post by **Big Kev** » Thu Mar 18, 2010 12:24 am

Apparently the continuity errors start from almost the first scene where Debbie Gibson has nail varnish on and then there's a close up of 'her' hands operating a computer and the nail varnish has gone. Quality

Shaun · Post by **Shaun** » Thu Mar 18, 2010 2:18 am

haha me and my mate aquired this a while back and sat through it for a laugh, its quite funny

DexterPunk · Post by **DexterPunk** » Thu Mar 18, 2010 2:42 am

Haha!!! Genius... Have to watch that one

Unforgiven · Post by **Unforgiven** » Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:54 am

What the hell was that shark doing at 30000 feet?

w00dsy · Post by **w00dsy** » Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:18 am

Unforgiven wrote:What the hell was that shark doing at 30000 feet?

they were coming down to land, so it may have been a more realistic 20,000 feet.

DexterPunk · Post by **DexterPunk** » Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:08 pm

Yeah it would be flying much lower... A shark at 30,000 ft would just be silly!! :P

Unforgiven · Post by **Unforgiven** » Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:26 pm

w00dsy wrote:
Unforgiven wrote:What the hell was that shark doing at 30000 feet?
they were coming down to land, so it may have been a more realistic 20,000 feet.

My mistake, 20,000ft makes alot more sense. I should have researched my facts a bit more.

A.R.S.E.

Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus

Re: Mega Shark VS Giant Octopus