rFactor2

ISI's new sim rFactor
Post Reply
User avatar
r8response
Cry baby
Cry baby
Posts: 8565
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD

rFactor2

Post by r8response »

Well its in development, and ISI has slowly been releasing new screenies

Image
ImageImage
Image
Image

ImageImage
User avatar
Exar Kun
Sensible Mick
Posts: 11325
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: rFactor2

Post by Exar Kun »

The lighting on the oval looks good but the other screenshots don't really do anything for me. Where's the environment mapped reflections? At least the car looks like it's self-shadowing. I'm glad rF is still going as it's the only way we get to play a lot of series but I don't know how much new rF2 will bring to the table.
"If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!"
User avatar
thornz
Posts: 1396
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: rFactor2

Post by thornz »

If they can have the physics, or at least the feel of LFS/iraing/netkar, I can see this being a big winner. It was the one thing that stopped so many people playing this as there sim of choice. I'll be hoping for the best, could be the one to get me back into sim racing.
User avatar
durbster
The Whack Wasp Warrior
Posts: 5220
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:29 am
Location: Nottingham, Mother England

Re: rFactor2

Post by durbster »

Yeah the screenshots are a bit disappointing which I just don't understand in this day and age. With the power of todays graphics cards I just can't figure out how you can make a game look so dated. A couple of those are barely distinguishable from GPL screenshots.

Mind you, as much as I like rFactor, I've never liked the ISI graphics engines. They always have weird lighting and somehow the graphics never look particularly solid compared to Papy or LFS.

They also need to sort out the movemvent physics, which is part of why I think a lot of people don't regard rFactor as having comparable physics to other sims. I mean things like how the car bounces around. Simple things such as how the car rolls really help in creating the immersion I reckon. LFS was one of the first sims to have things like tyre walls bouncing around convincingly, and I think that stuff like that gives you more confidence in the physics engine.
nutty
Spam King
Spam King
Posts: 5804
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:43 am
Location: Brisvegas

Re: rFactor2

Post by nutty »

What they really need to do is improve the update/modding system for end users.

Its soo fucking complicated to deal with setting up new mods/tracks, thats the real reason ive been turned off rfactor
User avatar
durbster
The Whack Wasp Warrior
Posts: 5220
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:29 am
Location: Nottingham, Mother England

Re: rFactor2

Post by durbster »

Yeah that as well. A game designed entirely for modding that doesn't have any kind of mod-management system was a but of a stupid decision.

Edit: Just found a twitter page from the main man in rFactor. I'm not on Twitter so I dunno exactly what's going on but there are some interesting things on there:
http://twitter.com/rfactor2
ysu
Smooth Lubricator.
Posts: 12070
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: The wet central coast

Re: rFactor2

Post by ysu »

so is it trendy to have a go at rF2? ;)
I don't mind those screens, they aren't the best possible with today's computers, but not bad at all - for race sims, definitely.
Foggy & twilight are not environments usually found in this genre either. Textures are nice, shadows are correct looking.
However, they don't tell me anything about the program itself. So I'll reserve any evaluation for when there's actually something to see. :)
Surprise, no sig. Now there is. Or is there?
User avatar
durbster
The Whack Wasp Warrior
Posts: 5220
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:29 am
Location: Nottingham, Mother England

Re: rFactor2

Post by durbster »

It's starting to look a bit better -
http://www.virtualr.net/rfactor-2-one-new-screenshot/

I thought that was from iRacing when I saw it, but apparently it's rF.
Post Reply