The Tigers can ROAR!!!!

Threeps · Post by **Threeps** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:57 pm

WOW those Tigers are pretty damn fine. I am biassed though. What a fine effort tonight against the premiers. 54 - 2 against the Canterbury Bulldogs.

Could they go all the way?

I hope so

Post by **Bauer** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:36 pm

I thought tonight was the saints and the dockers

actually that was a good game and a very close result

and wasnt it good to hear that the poms got whooped by the Danes

So who are the tigers anyway? Balmain arent they?

Threeps · Post by **Threeps** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:08 am

Very nicely constructed narrow minded comment Stu.

[history lesson]It was the Blmain Tigers until after the 1999 season, where they were forced into a merger with the Western Suburbs Magpies (both founder clubs from 1908). They have since been known as the Wests Tigers and for the first time since the merger, they have made the finals. And look to get a top four spot also.[/history lesson]

Post by **Bauer** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:14 am

to be honest I knew they were now called Wests Tigers but not until after I posted. But even though I knew they were Balmain, I would never have been able to guess that the "Wests" part of the merger were previously magpies.

I only watch 4 games of League per year and 3 of them have already been on.

Sterling · Post by **Sterling** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:19 am

So you've taken up spamming this forum as well now threeps........is the OzB forum not enough for you?

Oh.....and could they go all the way? How can they if the Broncos are going to win!

Nigel · Post by **Nigel** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:51 am

Bauer wrote:I thought tonight was the saints and the dockers
actually that was a good game and a very close result

and wasnt it good to hear that the poms got whooped by the Danes

So who are the tigers anyway? Balmain arent they?

Love the segway into commentting on 3 different football codes and slaging off the poms as well.

Threeps · Post by **Threeps** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:34 am

Sterling wrote:So you've taken up spamming this forum as well now threeps........is the OzB forum not enough for you?

Yeah, sorry. I got excited by the result lsat night and no one to rant to.

Post by **norbs** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:27 pm

Was a good result Threeps. The best bit was the dirty bloody bulldogs got another 50 put on them. Cant get enough of that.

nutty · Post by **nutty** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:39 pm

As long as the bulldogs get beaten I dont care who by.
Tho I am a Sharks/Parra fan

Post by **norbs** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:50 pm

GO PARRA

Threeps · Post by **Threeps** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:55 pm

I was tempted to pick the Eels but finally decided that the Dragons' form is just too goood at the moment. I think Gasnier will carve yet another team apart.

Should be another great game tomorrow

Sarsippius · Post by **Sarsippius** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:44 pm

I'm more an AFL fan but don't mind league, the tigers were on fire last night. I'd be wary of getting too overconfident though, some of those plays while quite spectacular were very hit or miss and against a better team could get you in trouble.

r8response · Post by **r8response** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 2:02 pm

GO THE BRONCOS
GO THE LIONS

don't care about any other QLD team

Post by **norbs** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 2:39 pm

r8response wrote:GO THE BRONCOS
GO THE LIONS

don't care about any other QLD team

The swans smashed the lions last week.

r8response · Post by **r8response** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 2:55 pm

norbs wrote:
r8response wrote:GO THE BRONCOS
GO THE LIONS

don't care about any other QLD team
The swans smashed the lions last week.

i don't mind, as long as collingwood set the wooden spoon.

i hope the swans can keep they're momentum and take the cup

Nigel · Post by **Nigel** » Sat Aug 20, 2005 3:24 pm

I have no idea about league. For some reason, Union is more appealing. But I have little to no idea about rugby. For starters, why do you have prostitutes on the team ?

Post by **Bauer** » Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:36 am

fourthof5 wrote: For starters, why do you have prostitutes on the team ?

no one took the bait Nige. The reason they have hookers is that no one will stick their nose up another blokes arse for free so they need them.

Unless you are talking about off field, then they need hookers to avoid another 'Bulldog Binge'

Oh and I saw on sportsworld this morning that it was 70's week. Does that mean i was right in calling the Tigers Balmain?

Nigel · Post by **Nigel** » Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:56 am

yeah no one took the bait. But your analysis sounds about right

Threeps · Post by **Threeps** » Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:50 am

Bauer wrote: Oh and I saw on sportsworld this morning that it was 70's week. Does that mean i was right in calling the Tigers Balmain?

They did wear the Balmain style jerseys this week.

nutty · Post by **nutty** » Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:19 am

fourthof5 wrote:I have no idea about league. For some reason, Union is more appealing. But I have little to no idea about rugby. For starters, why do you have prostitutes on the team ?

Im the same, I love union its by far the better sport. Im planning to head to rugby world cup 2007 in france.

macca · Post by **macca** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 10:26 am

Threeps wrote:WOW those Tigers are pretty damn fine.................

Could they go all the way?

I hope so

Well they certainly did, what a magnificent result, especially for the merger of two founding clubs.

Not a great grand final but if you are a Wests Tigers fan then it is great, plus another Sydney win, woohoo

breakneck · Post by **breakneck** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:28 am

Everyone I go for at the moment loses

Now I know what it feels like to be English

Poor ol' Cowboys.. I think they looked better with the ball. They just had fewer points on the board.

Threeps · Post by **Threeps** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:02 pm

breakneck wrote:Everyone I go for at the moment loses Now I know what it feels like to be English

I loved it, how good was Pat Richards after the injury that should have put him out for three weeks. And the confidence of young Benji to give a flick pass to him in a grand final. Where's the conservative approach to win the big games? I guess they played the same style of football that got them there, and it paid off.

Scott Prince's kicking game was superb, probably was the difference between the two in the end.

Scottie · Post by **Scottie** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:02 pm

what's an NRL?

Post by **norbs** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:05 pm

Scottie wrote:what's an NRL?

A team game, a bit like AFL, except it isnt played by poofters leaping around like ballerinas and taking dives when Bazza Hall gives them a love tap. And we use a proper footy, not a shrunk down footy made smaller ( cnat find proof of this, so lets just make the assumption that Im right and we can all be happy) so those faggots can kick it further. And its red, just like an AFL players arse after his team mates have had their way with him. They are so soft in AFL, they award a point if they miss a goal just so the fudge packers who play it dont burst into tears.

Hmm, that seems about right.

A.R.S.E.

The Tigers can ROAR!!!!

The Tigers can ROAR!!!!

Re: The Tigers can ROAR!!!!