Load capacity!

Chat about cars, motorbikes and all other transport
Post Reply
User avatar
norbs
fucking right wing vegan lesbian
Posts: 24201
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:01 pm
Contact:

Load capacity!

Post by norbs »

Now that I have the attention of all you dirty fucks, I have a question.

There is some talk of getting rid of the beloved VY wagon and replacing it with a van. *gasp*

Yes, well, it isnt for me. The brides little side business, selling fancy cushions, is kicking goals and she needs something bigger.

What I want to know is the load capacity of the 2004 VY wagon. So we can compare with things like the iLoad and Berlingo etc etc.

Any clues?
Sarc ; my second favourite type of gasm.
User avatar
pixelboy
Posts: 8064
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:07 pm
Location: Shitney

Re: Load capacity!

Post by pixelboy »

I thought this was a thread to test out Smith post operation?
eek
User avatar
pixelboy
Posts: 8064
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:07 pm
Location: Shitney

Re: Load capacity!

Post by pixelboy »

Looks like 1400L.
The Sportwagon, unlike the previous VZ wagon, which shared its long-wheelbase with the Statesman/Caprice is built on the same short-wheelbase platform as the sedan. This shift in thinking means cargo capacity is reduced from VZ's 1,402 litres (370 US gal) to 895 litres (236 US gal) but the sedan's near 50:50 weight distribution is retained.
eek
User avatar
Exar Kun
Sensible Mick
Posts: 11330
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Load capacity!

Post by Exar Kun »

The maximum luggage compartment weight of the Lotus I borrowed over the holidays was 50kg. And only if it was all securely tethered!

There's all sorts of ways of measuring the cargo volume. Most wagons it's up to the sill line of the windows but with vans not having any windows (or they're just not relevant) I'm not sure what they'd quote?
"If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!"
User avatar
wobblysauce
Seen it, Done it, Invented it!
Posts: 10489
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:53 am
Location: On an Island in the south

Re: Load capacity!

Post by wobblysauce »

You could always go for a weekend test drive, and well fill it up and compare.
Some play it safe on the merry-go-round, others go for the thrills of the roller-coaster.

ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ vs ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ

I have a joke for you. I have a prediction that you are going to walk into a bar, my prediction was wrong and your wallet is gone.
pab
Posts: 2486
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:40 pm

Re: Load capacity!

Post by pab »

PB
Radioactive Race Engineering #16 / Lightning Karts KT100s #61
User avatar
norbs
fucking right wing vegan lesbian
Posts: 24201
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Load capacity!

Post by norbs »

Thanks Pix.

1.4 cubic m vs 3.7 for the Berlingo and 4.3 for the iLoad. Jesus.

I think the Berlingo would be heaps, but it doesnt look that big.

Interesting, thanks gents.

Oh, and Pete, I doubt she'd go 45k for a Vee Dub. :)
Sarc ; my second favourite type of gasm.
User avatar
Bauer
Posts: 7264
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:00 pm
Location: Tassie
Contact:

Re: Load capacity!

Post by Bauer »

get an iLoad. They come with pedo doors. Also handy for carpet layers apparently
--------------
Stu
User avatar
Exar Kun
Sensible Mick
Posts: 11330
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Load capacity!

Post by Exar Kun »

norbs wrote:
1.4 cubic m vs 3.7 for the Berlingo and 4.3 for the iLoad. Jesus.

I think the Berlingo would be heaps, but it doesnt look that big.
Remember they'll only be measuring to the window sills in the Commodore whereas the Berlingo and other commercials will be to the roof with those figures. So the actual volume difference won't be that great. But it'll certainly be more accessible and usable in the commercials.
"If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!"
User avatar
norbs
fucking right wing vegan lesbian
Posts: 24201
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Load capacity!

Post by norbs »

Exar Kun wrote:
norbs wrote:
1.4 cubic m vs 3.7 for the Berlingo and 4.3 for the iLoad. Jesus.

I think the Berlingo would be heaps, but it doesnt look that big.
Remember they'll only be measuring to the window sills in the Commodore whereas the Berlingo and other commercials will be to the roof with those figures. So the actual volume difference won't be that great. But it'll certainly be more accessible and usable in the commercials.
Doing some rough measurements myself, I got 1.88cm for the wagon with the seats down.

Thanks Mick.
Sarc ; my second favourite type of gasm.
User avatar
w00dsy
The Senna of Hoppers Crossing
Posts: 24457
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:41 pm
Location: incognito

Re: Load capacity!

Post by w00dsy »

My iload had the barrier but it's still 2.7m long, 1.4m wide and almost 1.5m high. Not sure what that is in cubic metres so I asked Nige, he said it's 20,874 cubic kilometres.
User avatar
norbs
fucking right wing vegan lesbian
Posts: 24201
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Load capacity!

Post by norbs »

w00dsy wrote:My iload had the barrier but it's still 2.7m long, 1.4m wide and almost 1.5m high. Not sure what that is in cubic metres so I asked Nige, he said it's 20,874 cubic kilometres.
Jesus. 5.67cm. (cubic metres, not centimetres)

Maybe the official numbers are conservative.
Sarc ; my second favourite type of gasm.
User avatar
w00dsy
The Senna of Hoppers Crossing
Posts: 24457
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:41 pm
Location: incognito

Re: Load capacity!

Post by w00dsy »

I think they are designed to get 2 pallets in them. I'm measuring from wall to wall, maybe the official people do it from inside the wheel arches.
Post Reply