Cities: Skylines (The game Simcity should have been)

General game chat
User avatar
GT VIRUS
Karen
Posts: 3637
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: Cities: Skylines (The game Simcity should have been)

Post by GT VIRUS »

The day-night features are available to all, it's the tourism specialty industry's that are restricted to After Dark
User avatar
wobblysauce
Seen it, Done it, Invented it!
Posts: 10489
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:53 am
Location: On an Island in the south

Re: Cities: Skylines (The game Simcity should have been)

Post by wobblysauce »

Yep, was just clarifying the paid what the paid update was.
Some play it safe on the merry-go-round, others go for the thrills of the roller-coaster.

ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ vs ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ

I have a joke for you. I have a prediction that you are going to walk into a bar, my prediction was wrong and your wallet is gone.
ysu
Smooth Lubricator.
Posts: 12070
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: The wet central coast

Re: Cities: Skylines (The game Simcity should have been)

Post by ysu »

Wobbs, I'm sorry but your clarification... :lol: :D

Anyway, the game is fun, again. And a few bucks to support these guys I reckon is nothing.

What I find very interesting is this reverse psychology with the DLC - they give you most of the update, and you pay for a tiny chunk only. I wonder if this enticed ppl to buy more, or less after all?
Surprise, no sig. Now there is. Or is there?
User avatar
DarrenM
Posts: 7251
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Cities: Skylines (The game Simcity should have been)

Post by DarrenM »

User avatar
norbs
fucking right wing vegan lesbian
Posts: 24184
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Cities: Skylines (The game Simcity should have been)

Post by norbs »

I knew before it ended where that was headed. ;)
Sarc ; my second favourite type of gasm.
Post Reply