Ferrari FF concept (612 replacement)

Post by **Big Kev** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:29 am

Looks a bit like the old BMW M coupe, but it's not too bad.

c.j · Post by **c.j** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:37 am

It is mean from the front, but as you say Kev too much M coupe in it.

r8response · Post by **r8response** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:13 am

"Butt" ugly

wobblysauce · Post by **wobblysauce** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:58 am

M Coupe.. or 1 Series(Bread Box).

Post by **Big Kev** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 3:58 am

I think you need to see a good front 3/4 shot to really see it properly. Not the best press release pics I've seen.

Ferrari has unveiled its first-ever production four-wheel-drive model, dubbed the Ferrari FF.

It's a front-engined V12 four-seater GT that not only replaces the 612 two-plus-two coupé but also aims to attract a new kind of “all-roads, all-weathers” Ferrari customer.

The new car, dubbed FF for its four seats and four-wheel drive, is designed by Pininfarina under the direction of Ferrari’s own chief designer, Flavio Manzoni.

The first Ferrari of modern times to accommodate four full-sized adults and their luggage, it will be unveiled at next month’s Geneva show, and go on sale soon afterwards.

Ferrari hopes it will appeal in particular to buyers who usually use all-wheel-drive saloons or SUVs for winter driving and especially ski trips at this time of the year.

The revolutionary Ferrari FF has an all-new, longer wheelbase chassis with a new design, all-independent suspension that incorporates the latest-generation magnetically adjustable dampers and standard Brembo carbon ceramic disc brakes.

The four-wheel drive system, claimed to be around 50 per cent lighter than comparable applications, preserves the desirable rear weight bias of recent V12 Ferraris. Called 4RM (for ‘Ruote Motrici’) the system is unique to Ferrari, using the car’s electronic systems seamlessly to direct torque to the front wheels when slippery conditions demand it, but mostly leaving the car in its desirable (and understeer-free) rear-wheel-drive state.

Though the Ferrari FF is more versatile than traditional Ferraris, Maranello counters any suggestions that it is “soft” by giving it a newly developed 6.25-litre V12 with just under 10 per cent more swept volume and 22 per cent more power than the 612, and a seven-speed double-clutch gearbox to replace the previous six-speed manual.

The Ferrari FF also gets the package of efficiency-building measures introduced in the California, including stop-start and smart charging to improve economy by about 10 per cent. The FF engine produces 650bhp at 8000rpm and 504lb ft of torque (up 16 per cent) at 5000rpm. Despite these higher outputs, CO2 output is dramatically slashed from 470 to 360g/km (23 per cent) while combined fuel consumption improves from a distinctly average 13.8mpg to 18.3mpg. The FF’s 0-62mph acceleration time of 3.7sec also undercuts the 612’s by 0.4 sec, while its 208mph top speed beats the 612 by about 10mph.

Ferrari claims an impressive kerb weight of 1795kg for the FF, undercutting the 612 by 50kg despite the presence of the new on-demand 4x4 system.

This and the fact that the FF is almost identical in length and width to the outgoing 612 (and only 30mm taller) suggests Ferrari has scored a considerable packaging coup, since the graceful lines allow full adult headroom in the rear, and the boot provides 450 litres of space with all passengers aboard, or 800 litres with the rear seats folded, figures which match many four-door models.

DexterPunk · Post by **DexterPunk** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 7:40 am

That's a disgrace!

Exar Kun · Post by **Exar Kun** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 7:43 am

It does indeed look like the old breadvan. Will have to see some shots from other angles. It's more interesting from a technical stand point really. An awd Ferrari isn't something I thought we'd see this soon but it does make sense.

Hazelb · Post by **Hazelb** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:48 am

Ordinary from the side @ best...

Santaria · Post by **Santaria** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:49 am

Do. Not. Want.

That is absolutely ugly!

Post by **Big Kev** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:18 am

sniffpetrol

wobblysauce · Post by **wobblysauce** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:08 pm

by 4 seats you have to have no legs to sit in the back?

Dan · Post by **Dan** » Sun Jan 23, 2011 9:23 am

[youtube] [/youtube]

bengatta · Post by **bengatta** » Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:55 pm

it should be good on snow, roads with sprinklers and at night... don't take one out in the sun, it will try to find some shade...

Post by **Hz-Lab** » Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:40 pm

as a Ferrari, it looks average, but looking at it as just a car, it looks awesome.

meanwhile, am i missing out on something? how come in all the movies and telly shows, Computers make that high pitched glitchy sound? none of my PC's have ever done that, i feel ripped off.

Scottie · Post by **Scottie** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:06 pm

mmm Marc Gene driving... at least in the french bit... envy! those conditions would be great to drive in! especially that car!

shame about the cosmetics

ysu · Post by **ysu** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:36 pm

is that a red bmw?

not a ferrari looking car, that's for sure.
I'd not pay money for it, especially not ferrari-money, but if it was free...

Gizmo · Post by **Gizmo** » Wed Jan 26, 2011 4:05 pm

UGLY! The tail of the car looks ok but wtf happened to the rest of it?

Post by **Big Kev** » Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:22 am

DexterPunk · Post by **DexterPunk** » Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:21 am

It's as bad as that fugly Porsche.

Gizmo · Post by **Gizmo** » Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:36 pm

Similar lines to a BMW 1 series.

w00dsy · Post by **w00dsy** » Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:12 pm

Gizmo wrote:Similar lines to a BMW 1 series.

exactly what i was thinking.

bengatta · Post by **bengatta** » Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:18 pm

w00dsy wrote:
Gizmo wrote:Similar lines to a BMW 1 series.

exactly what i was thinking.

and the silver one makes it more so...

Post by **Big Kev** » Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:07 am

oops

[youtube] [/youtube]

Takumi · Post by **Takumi** » Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:22 am

Wierd - really bad pot hole or something?

ysu · Post by **ysu** » Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:40 am

Takumi wrote:Wierd - really bad pot hole or something?

I'm guessing he cut the corner a bit.

A.R.S.E.