Forum rules
Please be careful about posting results in threads discussing current sporting events.
Where possible can the first person to start a thread on an event add *spoilers included* (or similar) to the thread title so that all discussion on the event is kept in one place and readers are aware that the content may contain the results.
matticooper wrote:They had to fatten up the nose so Montoya could fit in LOL
Have you seen recent pics of Monty? He must have lost 10kgs already!! Must be on some psycho workout regime.
As for the car - side pods are Sauber-ish at the front like pixelboy said and then waste away very quickly. I was always a fan of the narrow nose so don't like this one as much. In general, the cars are becoming much more complicated aero-wise this year. Hope this car can put up a fight to Ferrari in at least some races this year.
Exar Kun wrote:
Have you seen recent pics of Monty? He must have lost 10kgs already!! Must be on some psycho workout regime.
yeah and he had a swipe at Williams because they didn't do enough to get him fit and Ron Dennis has given him trainers etc to drop some lard. If he can't keep himself fit, then he aint even remotly dedicated enough to win the championship.
At the rear of the side pods is an upward sweeping wing which guides wind up and over the rear tyres. Mclaren have designed the inside edge of this piece of bodywork to sweep quite high and have attached an extra wing component from the inside edge of this sweep to the main cowling cover.
Effectively this gives the Mclaren an extra 3rd wing (i.e. 1 full front wing, 1 full rear wing, and a FULL MIDDLE WING). Whethe this wing falls within the new regulations for wings is unknown to me.
An additional piece of interesting observation of this wing is that in the photographs above the leading edge is high, whilst the trailing edge is low (this is the reverse of a normal front and pack wing). My only conclusion then is that this wing is not designed so much to aid with the downforce of the package but to aid with its stablity by smoothing the flow of air down and around the rear of the car.
- When trouble arises and things look bad, there is always one individual who perceives a solution and is willing to take command. Very often, that individual is crazy.
- If youre paddling upstream in a canoe and a wheel falls off, how many pancakes fit in a doghouse? None! Icecream doesn't have bones!!!
Montey wrote:Something of note on the new Mclaren...
At the rear of the side pods is an upward sweeping wing which guides wind up and over the rear tyres. Mclaren have designed the inside edge of this piece of bodywork to sweep quite high and have attached an extra wing component from the inside edge of this sweep to the main cowling cover.
Effectively this gives the Mclaren an extra 3rd wing (i.e. 1 full front wing, 1 full rear wing, and a FULL MIDDLE WING). Whethe this wing falls within the new regulations for wings is unknown to me..
The middle wing is known as a 'shelf wing' and was run by several teams last year. McLaren's shelf wing this year is of note as it has gained a more '3D' shape like Renault used on theirs last year.
And you're correct in your observation - these wings aren't there to create downforce but to smooth flow to the rear wing.
When you look at it side on, the top of the nose and the way it drops down the sidepods is getting even closer to the profile of the tear drop. A lot of teams haven't had that effect to the same extreme that McLaren have. One thing i like about McLarens is they never look like any other car out there.
Scottie wrote:The rear mirrors are so wide appart!
The mirrors on the F2004 were like that too. A couple of people remarked at the start of last year how restricted visibility must have been from them - and that it could have contributed to the Schumi-Montoya accident at Monaco.